WIX Archives
Re: Quite clearly lots of people do want to talk about it!
Posted by Tim Savage on Mon Jun 17, 2002 03:56:01 PM
In reply top Quite clearly lots of people do want to talk about it! posted by Paul Coggan on Mon Jun 17, 2002 03:39:56 PM
Paul:
There aren't any hard definitions in place because most of the owner/operators don't care. We are interested in the longevity of the airframe and the ability to fly it. Lets look to the NASM and the USAFM to preserve airplanes with their "factory" pieces. You can't have it both ways, you cannot preserver them with all the original bits and still fly them-sixty years later.
I personally believe that if a airplane is built from scratch like the Flugwerks 190s or the 262s then they are replicas. I don't consider a Mustang or Spitfire that has had all its skin, etc replaced a replica. It is a fact of life that if you want to operate these airplanes most of the old metal is eventually going to go. I don't imagine that in the next 10-15 years you will see P-51s flying with much original skin...the longerons are just turning to dust from what I understand.
My 2 cents.
Follow Ups:
- Re: Quite clearly lots of people do want to talk about it! - Paul Coggan Mon Jun 17, 2002 04:09:15 PM
- Re: Quite clearly lots of people do want to talk about it! - Tim Savage Mon Jun 17, 2002 04:30:10 PM
- Re: Quite clearly lots of people do want to talk about it! - Paul Mon Jun 17, 2002 04:24:56 PM
- Re: Quite clearly lots of people do want to talk about it! - PeterA Mon Jun 17, 2002 06:22:51 PM
- lol@Peter - Tony Tue Jun 18, 2002 05:35:53 AM
- Peter, does that mean that............. - Cees Tue Jun 18, 2002 06:33:23 AM
- Re: Peter, does that mean that............. - PeterA Tue Jun 18, 2002 11:14:34 AM
- Well in my book at least...... - Paul Coggan Tue Jun 18, 2002 11:22:13 AM
- Re: Well in my book at least...... - Scott WRG Editor Tue Jun 18, 2002 05:58:48 PM
- Re: Peter, does that mean that............. - Dan Johnson Tue Jun 18, 2002 02:02:53 PM
- Re: Peter, does that mean that............. - John Sanderson Wed Jun 19, 2002 04:44:24 AM
- Re: Peter, does that mean that............. - Paul McMillan Wed Jun 19, 2002 05:26:52 AM
- Re: Peter, does that mean that............. - PeterA Wed Jun 19, 2002 07:23:35 AM
- Thanks at least I know it is PK??? N/T - Paul McMillan Wed Jun 19, 2002 07:39:28 AM
- Re: Peter, does that mean that............. - PeterA Wed Jun 19, 2002 07:23:35 AM
- Re: Peter, does that mean that............. - PeterA Wed Jun 19, 2002 07:32:47 AM
- Re: Peter, does that mean that............. - Paul McMillan Wed Jun 19, 2002 05:26:52 AM
- Well in my book at least...... - Paul Coggan Tue Jun 18, 2002 11:22:13 AM
- Re: Peter, does that mean that............. - PeterA Tue Jun 18, 2002 11:14:34 AM
- Re: Quite clearly lots of people do want to talk about it! - PeterA Mon Jun 17, 2002 06:22:51 PM
- Re: Quite clearly lots of people do want to talk about it! - Paul Mon Jun 17, 2002 04:24:56 PM
- Re: Quite clearly lots of people do want to talk about it! - JohnH Mon Jun 17, 2002 06:00:30 PM
- Re: Quite clearly lots of people do want to talk about it! - JohnH Tue Jun 18, 2002 08:53:51 AM
- Re: Quite clearly lots of people do want to talk about it! - Tim Savage Mon Jun 17, 2002 04:30:10 PM