WIX Archives

Re: But a Warbird?!?!?!

Posted by Scott WRG Editor on Tue Dec 23, 2003 10:55:29 PM

In reply top But a Warbird?!?!?! posted by Olivier Lacombe on Tue Dec 23, 2003 05:05:45 PM

Oh I agree, not terribly efficient. I'm more worried about FedEx planes. Theres hundreds of them of all sizes and no passengers to worry about.

As for the FM-2 post I was just illustrating what was possible, not what was logical

Scott WRG Editor

: Why oh why would you use a Warbird for such a mission? Gr
: anted, it's fast. Granted, it's nimble. But it's not eas
: y to fly and sometimes you have to put lots of work into t
: hem to make them fly!
:
: On a one-way WMD mission, civilian aircrafts are the best.
: Relatively cheap, somewhat incognito, fast (Piper Aerost
: ar, Bonanza, Mooney, Cessna 210, and all the turbine and j
: et stuff). You get good payload, good range and they are
: easy to fly. A Warbird is not. A SeaFury is hard to fly.
: Harder than a Spit or a Hurrie.
:
: Sure, you can use a Warbird to do damage, but why use that
: when any business aircraft will do the jobs 5 times bette
: r?
:
: Ollie

Follow Ups: