WIX Archives
Agreed!
Posted by Olivier Lacombe on Tue Dec 23, 2003 11:07:36 PM
In reply top Re: But a Warbird?!?!?! posted by Scott WRG Editor on Tue Dec 23, 2003 10:55:29 PM
: Oh I agree, not terribly efficient. I'm more worried about
: FedEx planes. Theres hundreds of them of all sizes and no
: passengers to worry about.
:
: As for the FM-2 post I was just illustrating what was poss
: ible, not what was logical
:
: Scott WRG Editor
:
: : Why oh why would you use a Warbird for such a mission?
: Gr
: : anted, it's fast. Granted, it's nimble. But it's not e
: as
: : y to fly and sometimes you have to put lots of work into
: t
: : hem to make them fly!
: :
: : On a one-way WMD mission, civilian aircrafts are the bes
: t.
: : Relatively cheap, somewhat incognito, fast (Piper Aero
: st
: : ar, Bonanza, Mooney, Cessna 210, and all the turbine and
: j
: : et stuff). You get good payload, good range and they ar
: e
: : easy to fly. A Warbird is not. A SeaFury is hard to fl
: y.
: : Harder than a Spit or a Hurrie.
: :
: : Sure, you can use a Warbird to do damage, but why use th
: at
: : when any business aircraft will do the jobs 5 times bet
: te
: : r?
: :
: : Ollie