WIX Archives
Re: Sea Fury vs Tempest II
Posted by Tom on Thu Dec 05, 2002 03:45:04 PM
In reply top Neither do I ...... posted by Christer on Tue Dec 03, 2002 06:10:38 PM
I think that another problem is that the Indian Tempest II projects are in much worse condition and in fewer numbers than the available Sea Furies. The batch brought in by Ed Jurist from Iraq were in better condition than the various MKII Tempests that I have seen and also people have been using Furies for a number of years. Another stumbling block is probably the Centaurus as the Yanks aren't exactly won over by this powerplant and the RNHF don't have much luck with them either, the only reliable examples (as far as I know) are Ellsworth Getchell's, the ex-OFMC machine when it was here and the example restored in NZ recently and sold to Aus so I remember.
Tom ;)
Follow Ups:
- Re: Sea Fury vs Tempest II - Christer Thu Dec 05, 2002 04:01:46 PM
- Re: Sea Fury vs Tempest II - Tom Thu Dec 05, 2002 05:00:01 PM
- Sanders' 924G = Centaurus - bdk Thu Dec 05, 2002 09:26:09 PM
- HATE to say it but why not use an R-3350? - Richard Allnutt Thu Dec 05, 2002 11:57:39 PM
- Sanders' 924G = Centaurus - bdk Thu Dec 05, 2002 09:26:09 PM
- Re: Sea Fury vs Tempest II - Tom Thu Dec 05, 2002 05:00:01 PM