WIX Archives

Spitfire Collection...

Posted by Joe Scheil on Wed Sep 04, 2002 12:01:54 AM

In reply top RAFM collecting policy posted by Stuart on Tue Sep 03, 2002 07:54:40 PM

The point of view of an American is that the Spitfire and Hurricane exemplify the fight for the Isles in 1940-45. The Spitfire is also an aircraft that went through a long service history, with several different functions. What one Spitfire should they keep? A Mk I, IIa, LfIXc, VII, XIX, F.24 or Mk XVIII? What is the representative subtype? Answer: ALL The Spitfire exemplifies the adaptation of a fighting machine to stay technologicly relevant, and the dedication of a people to avoid extinction of a way of life. In my opinion it is the duplication of a significant tpye that is missing in many major museums. While it may be very neat to secure a Wapiti for the RAF museum, it must be remembered that a Wapiti is not a significant type for the Museum. It is rare and has "collectible desirability", but is no Halifax or Stirling. As for the display of the Halifax, unrestored original can never be "restored" to original. The Buffalo was a complete failure for the RAF and I am sure its RAF pilots would be amused to see the trading if a Mk V or a IX for one of those things...If it were possible. They probably wanted to trade back then! Personally if I were Bill Gates, after building up all the Mustangs I wanted, A, B, D, F, G, H. I would build a lineup of three rows of fighters, Me 109 B-K, Spitfire MkI thru XIX, with the postwar ones for good measure, and all of the Fw-190's. Probably about 3 rows of 10 each! Imagine that!

Follow Ups: