WIX Archives

Not Possible

Posted by Joe Scheil on Wed Feb 26, 2003 10:51:00 AM

In reply top Just thinking... posted by Mike Henniger on Wed Feb 26, 2003 09:32:16 AM

The B-29 and B-50 are completly different aircraft, very similar to to "sameness" of the Shackleton and Lancaster. They are developments of each other with similar spars and shapes, but no commonality. The B-50 was developed into the C-97 and share wings and tail sections. The B-50 at POF could be mated with C-97 bits from the several that are around at this time, but it would cost a bit of money, and there are scrappable/partable C-97's closer than Greenland! Remember that the B-29 Kee Bird was burned, and that Spar section was heavily damaged by heat. It probably has no business being considered for a flyer, and to transport it out is nearly impossible. There are spar sections around that are much easier to get and transportable. (Albequerque, NM for example) In considering the numerous projects at POF as well, there are much rarer aircraft that need restoration/conservation than the B-50. The importance of the B-50 must also be considered as a function of its cost. Yes the LL II is the most historic B-50. But what is that worth as a static to an organization versus a flying, identifiable to audiences, B-17? Someday perhaps, but POF is currently on a program of building a first class facility to house the collection. Its selling of the "discovered" Northrop Alpha N896Y (previously in store) should tell you how serious the museum is about protecting the future of the collection. Makes you wonder what else is in the secret barn doesn't it?

Joe

Follow Ups: