WIX Archives
You've GOT to be KIDDING!
Posted by Greg C on Wed Sep 18, 2002 10:46:30 AM
In reply top Authenticity vs. Political Correctness posted by Ryan Keough on Tue Sep 17, 2002 10:00:26 PM
When it comes to historical revisionism, it's clear where the line should be. When it's ok to change or omitt things like "The Dragon..." where does it stop? Next thing you know, the Nazis will have been a humanitarian organization trying to relocate economically underprivelaged minorities into public housing!
: For over twelve years we have been touring the B-17 "Nine
: O Nine" and the B-24 "All American / Dragon and His Tail"
: across the United States to over 135 cities a year. In tha
: t time, our B-24 has taken on several paint schemes... ori
: ginally painted all around as the "All American"... then g
: etting the right side redone for sponsorship as "Golden Gi
: rl". In its most recent scheme it is painted as a 5th Air
: Force veteran, the "Dragon and His Tail" of the Joseph Pag
: oni crew in the 43rd BG, 64th BS and commemorating what ma
: y have been the last scrapped USAF surplus B-24 as it stoo
: d in Kingman AZ. The nose art is one of the most memorable
: of WWII as it features a full fuselage design of a dragon
: clutching a bare-breasted woman (in cartoon form).
:
: Though we have had the design on the plane for over two ye
: ars, recently we have started drawing criticisms from a ca
: mpaign by a few people to get the nose art changed, citing
: many opinions based around what can be considered some mo
: re right-wing moral thoughts. In this campaign, it has bee
: n called "public pornography" and "a gateway to further de
: gradation of morality leading to deviant behavior". Though
: some claims are very hard to believe, I respect their opi
: nion and am one of many in the CF that have been rethinkin
: g the future of that paint scheme.
:
: My question is where does one draw the line? Ever since ai
: rcraft have been saved from the scrappers torch, private c
: ollectors and museums have applied authentic nose art to t
: heir aircraft regardless of whether the model has clothes
: or not. The owners simply sought to recreate the aircraft
: as it would have been during WWII. The nose art as it was
: applied in WWII was a symbol of the freedom our men were f
: ighting for, and yes, they expressed that freedom by paint
: ing whatever they wanted on their planes. Our warbirds tod
: ay are historic museum pieces cataloging the history of WW
: II or any other conflict... should they not be painted as
: they were?
:
: When hearing recently that John Ashcroft demanded that an
: antique sculpture of a nude which could be seen in the bac
: kground during press conferences be covered or removed, I
: started to wonder how far we have come. Do we now change h
: istory in reaction to a party political moral code? Are we
: to lock down Renaissance sculpture galleries? Will Nation
: al Geographic now be considered pornographic because of an
: article on a tribe in Africa? What are we to do as warbir
: d owners and enthusiasts... do we pick only nose art that
: shows "lighter" subjects or change existing ones by adding
: bikinis or shirts or burlap sacks to them?
:
: Opinions?